Significant Analysis of “You Ruled the Earth, But Not the Air”

Philosophical Analysis of Muhammad Ali Pasha’s Poem “You Ruled the Earth, But Not the Air” from “Romantic Whispers of the Archipelago”

By: Clara K. Johnson

Muhammad Ali Pasha’s “You Ruled the Earth, But Not the Air” from “Romantic Whispers of the Archipelago”is a deep-seated reflection on the boundaries to human influence, the immortality of truth and the sacredness of liberty. At the very start of the poem, there are haunting questions, such as the one that asks who turned the lamps, which illuminated the path, off, there was a silent destruction of direction, hope, and innocence. These interrogatives establish the philosophical mood: the history is filled with the tyrants who deceive territories and people, but they find that their power is weak in front of something more hidden and ever-indefinable the forces of existence air, breathe, truth, and memory.

Overall, the poem places material control and immaterial resistance in opposition to each other. It is one thing to be said to rule the earth, which means rule of physical terrain, material items, and flesh, but to not rule the air is to mention the inability to conquer freedom, spirit, or to even rule the breath of life. Breath is universal or free of property, it is universally shared and is beyond regulation, another metaphor of human dignity as well as truth even under pressuring forms of dominance. This brings back to ancient philosophy: to the Stoics, the breath (pneuma) was the force of life and the Eastern points of view regard it as the connection between body and world. Pasha recovers this very metaphysical concept and demands that power disintegrates standing in front of the invisible.

Memory and accountability is another problem that the poem addresses. His repeated of the word who leaves the poet in a position of passing the blame back to those who are not around of committed to silence. However, he hints that the truth itself, as dawn, is bound to become, nevertheless. This has reminiscences of existentialism philosophy to it – in which human beings exist in confusion and repression, yet this dissatisfaction means nothing without seeking out genuine being. It also refers to the Platonic conception that shadows and lies will not survive over the coming of light.

Love and suffering come as some sort of input by the poet to this quest of the truth. Using lover blood, the poets walk up rocky trail, none of which has blazed to trace: the poets, Pasha recognizes the sacrificial place of poets and visionaries: they suffer, and through the suffering, they show the truths no one can. This makes poetry an act of philosophy, similar to testifiction and protest. It is the sorrow, silence, and sighs in the poem that are not a weakness, but philosophical evidences that something is transcendental and cannot be overcome.

The poem highlights the two persistently insisting at its end upon the fact that justice is inevitable: truth will rise like the dawn. This sentence borders on prophecy. It allows an idea that the very existence possesses a moral curve, which will lean towards the light and revelation. Truth is something people can never fully suppress despite the fact that people, despite all their efforts to put the human voices to silence or their dreams, are too elemental or much like air which cannot fully be blocked by anything. The hope maybe the poet thereby found not in political structures but on metaphysical certainty: the unnoticed laws of being are sure to lead to eventual letting.

The poem is philosophically opposing nihilism. Despite its acceptance of suffering, loss, and silencing, it embraces the fact that the truth, memory, and justice are deeply a part of life. The whispers that wind creates indicate that even the tiniest amounts of resisting amount to an unchallenged that. In that regard, the work of Pasha conforms to a resilience philosophy: the eternal aspects of life such as breath, memory, truth and others can withstand forces of time.

References