In the contemporary world, technology is no longer just a facility; it is the ultimate expression of power and a primary driver of foreign policy and international relations. Today, global economies thrive on technological advancement, making tech supremacy crucial for national security and economic growth. Within this race, tech sovereignty has emerged as a critical necessity. It refers to a nation’s ability to independently control its data, microchips, Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems, and digital infrastructure without relying on foreign entities. True sovereignty means a country can independently dictate its digital destiny rather than remaining entirely dependent on foreign giants like Apple, Google, or Microsoft.

A lack of tech sovereignty poses a direct threat to national security. When a nation’s data is stored on foreign servers, citizen privacy is compromised, and without privacy, national security cannot exist. Conversely, nations that pioneer technologies like AI and advanced chip manufacturing reap immense economic wealth due to high-speed production capabilities; for instance, a complete iPhone can be manufactured and packaged in just 10 to 15 hours. In contrast, countries lacking tech sovereignty suffer from sluggish growth, reduced market competitiveness, and outdated economic models. Furthermore, tech dominance allows powerful nations to control global politics, manipulate public opinion, and influence foreign elections. Consequently, modern foreign policy is no longer mapped out solely on land or sea, but through digital supremacy.

Technology is increasingly weaponized in global geopolitics, as demonstrated by the US-China Trade War. The United States banned the Chinese tech giant Huawei and restricted its access to advanced microchips to slow down China’s technological progress. Similarly, following the Russia-Ukraine war, corporations like Apple and Google blocked or restricted their services in Russia, severely impacting its economy and daily civilian life.
To counter such vulnerabilities, nations are establishing “Digital Borders.” China stands as a prime example with its “Great Firewall,” which bans platforms like Google and Facebook in favor of domestic alternatives like Baidu and WeChat, thereby shielding itself from external tech pressure. The consequences of lacking this autonomy were made clear in 2019 when the US government banned Huawei on national security grounds, cutting off its access to Google’s Android operating system and core services (YouTube, Gmail, Maps). Despite being on the verge of becoming the world’s top smartphone seller, Huawei’s international market collapsed because it lacked an independent ecosystem, forcing the company to spend years developing its own HarmonyOS from scratch.

The global vulnerability regarding hardware is equally severe. Over 90% of the world’s advanced microchips are manufactured by a single Taiwanese company, TSMC. When the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted supply chains, global manufacturing for automobiles, computers, and medical equipment ground to a halt. This crisis forced developed regions like the US and the European Union to realize their lack of tech sovereignty, recognizing that if China were to take control of Taiwan, the global tech industry could freeze. As a result, they are now investing billions of dollars to build domestic chip factories.
This struggle has intensified with the advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI). True sovereignty in the AI era requires nations to own their AI infrastructure, data, and localized AI models. Without AI sovereignty, countries will become entirely subservient to the tech superpowers controlling these systems, namely the US and China.

Experts have coined the term “Data Colonialism” to describe a new form of exploitation where a nation’s data is extracted as an asset for foreign powers. AI requires massive volumes of data to learn and improve. When a country lacks its own localized AI framework, its citizens, government institutions, and businesses rely on foreign AI tools. Consequently, sensitive corporate data, medical records, and personal details are transferred to foreign servers. If diplomatic relations deteriorate, foreign powers can analyze this data to identify and exploit the host nation’s economic, healthcare, and defense vulnerabilities.

Strategic Pillars for Achieving Tech Sovereignty

Achieving tech sovereignty is a long-term journey that requires a deliberate strategy. For developing nations, such as Pakistan, to escape digital dependency, they must focus on four fundamental pillars:

Data Sovereignty and Local Cloud Infrastructure: Establishing National Cloud Centers to ensure that sensitive government, defense, banking, and healthcare data is stored locally.
Support for Local Ecosystems: Providing incentives and tax exemptions to local startups, making domestic innovation more financially rewarding than foreign employment.
Retaining Brainpower: Recognizing that brains, not just machines, build sovereignty. Mitigating the “brain drain” by keeping local talent from migrating to the US, Europe, or the Gulf.
R&D Funding: Allocating substantial public and private funds toward high-tech research in fields like Cybersecurity, Quantum Computing, Cryptography, and AI.

Ultimately, tech sovereignty will dictate the survival, independence, and self-determination of nations in the modern era. To remain autonomous in national decision-making, it is imperative to actively build and maintain technological sovereignty.